Daniil Glinka vs Mats Rosenkranz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the recent six months, Glinka has demonstrated strength in converting breakpoints, achieving a 32.04% success rate. This contrasts with Rosenkranz, who has managed to convert 25.17% of their breakpoint opportunities. Glinka’s advantage in this area is an essential factor in match prediction, especially during live betting scenarios.

Analyzing second serve performance, Rosenkranz has shown superiority by winning 48.87% of points compared to Glinka’s 42.96%. This metric is vital for predicting match outcomes and gives Rosenkranz a slight edge in this aspect.

When it comes to return games, Glinka has secured 44.13% of their opponent's second serve points, while Rosenkranz has a marginally better record with 45.59%. However, first serve return stats reveal a divergence, with Glinka claiming 24.48% and Rosenkranz only 19.09%. Understanding these differences can influence predictions on who might be favored in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Rosenkranz has been more effective, saving 58.63% of breakpoints compared to Glinka’s 55.9%. This mental fortitude underlines Rosenkranz’s capacity to perform in critical moments, offering insights for those considering in-play betting.

In terms of overall performance over the past year, Glinka has a match win percentage of 61.19% (W/L 41/26), whereas Rosenkranz boasts a more impressive 67.65% (W/L 46/22). This holistic performance overview suggests Rosenkranz has a stronger winning tendency.

Surface preference plays a role as Glinka excels on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 57% (W/L 62/47), compared to a 47% win rate on clay (W/L 26/29). Meanwhile, Rosenkranz’s best surface is grass, standing at a 60% win rate (W/L 9/6), with weaker performance on hard courts at 44% (W/L 54/68).

Both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Glinka winning 67.92% of matches at this level (W/L 36/17), while Rosenkranz claims a higher success rate of 75% (W/L 33/11). This comparison underscores Rosenkranz's dominance at this competition level.

The quality of opposition faced is fairly similar, with Glinka’s opponents having an average rank of 430.06, marginally lower than Rosenkranz's 425.38. In deciding sets, a crucial aspect for live predictions, Rosenkranz excels, winning 67% of such sets compared to Glinka’s 47% over the past year.

Given these statistics, Rosenkranz appears to have the upper hand, particularly due to his superior win percentages and ability to perform under pressure. Based on recent form and overall statistics, Rosenkranz is predicted to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.